Now, I can reply in a more specific manner.
I think that table top is too small. I would want it larger. I think any smaller than 28" wide will limit the work you can do with a stable base. I also would want it deeper. This would give you the opportunity, to take a panel and just run it around a bearing'd bit in one continous motion to get the edging effect on all sides.
I would not mount the router directly to the table top. The reason is that you must make the hole in the table as wide as the largest diameter bit that you intend to use. Now if you then have to use a small dia bit and are working with smaller pieces of wood, supoort and feed control can become problematic. So I would use a commercial mounting plate that has easily replacable inserts for the router table. Here is one that I know works, but there are others.
Woodpecker
Don't use their fence!! It is subject to all the problems of fixed diameter fences. The same ones as fixed hole size in in plate, plus some other issues. For now go with one piece scarifical fences. Then the hole can be exactly the size you need.
Finally the router!. The decision really rests on whether or not you want to use the same router for both table and free hand use. If the router will only be used on the table then go with some thing in the 3+hp range. If you want to use it for both free hand and table mounted then get something in the 2+hp range. Anything smaller than that and you will limit the things you can do on the table, anything larger and it will be clumsy to use free hand.
Wow, I hope that doesn't come across as too negative, I don't mean it that way. The basic idea is correct, but that table as is wiil have very limited usage.
I hope I didn't just become the person we talked about :roll: